There’s a reason some systems are never properly documented.
It’s not because no one knows how they work.
It’s not because there wasn’t time.
And it’s definitely not because documentation isn’t valuable.
It’s because undocumented knowledge creates leverage.
The Quiet Power of Being “The Only One Who Knows”
Every company has them.
The person who knows that system.
The one who understands the weird edge case.
The one everyone pings when something breaks.
They’re described as “critical.”
“Essential.”
“Indispensable.”
But look closer.
That indispensability is rarely rewarded with security, pay, or influence.
It’s rewarded with dependence.
Documentation as a Threat
Proper documentation does one dangerous thing.
It removes mystery.
Once knowledge is written down, shared, and understood:
- ownership becomes visible
- decisions can be questioned
- replacements become possible
So documentation gets deprioritised.
Or postponed.
Or left “for later.”
Not officially — just practically.
The Double Bind
If you document everything thoroughly, something subtle happens.
You make yourself replaceable.
Not because you’re less valuable — but because your value becomes transferable.
And in organisations that don’t actually invest in people, that’s risky.
So people hoard knowledge.
Not maliciously.
Defensively.
Because experience has taught them that transparency doesn’t equal protection.
When Things Break
Undocumented systems fail loudly.
Incidents drag on.
Fixes take longer.
The same questions get asked repeatedly.
Leadership responds by praising “heroes.”
Late nights.
Quick fixes.
People who save the day.
But heroes are symptoms of bad systems — not signs of healthy ones.
The Cost No One Tracks
The real cost isn’t downtime.
It’s fragility.
One person leaves and everything slows.
Another burns out and knowledge disappears.
A third stops caring and things quietly decay.
But none of this shows up on a dashboard.
So it continues.
The Truth
Healthy organisations document because they expect people to leave, grow, or change roles.
Unhealthy ones rely on memory because they’re built around control.
And if your value comes from what only you know…
That’s not job security.
That’s a liability disguised as importance.
The Reframe
Knowledge should reduce risk — not create it.
If a company truly values resilience, it documents.
If it values people, it shares.
And if it values control?
It lets knowledge rot quietly until someone pays the price.
Usually the people closest to the work.
Leave a comment